Monday, June 3, 2019
The Effects Of Task Based Listening English Language Essay
The Effects Of Task Based Listening English  verbiage EssayIn the Malaysian educational context, the  important purpose of English  run-in  instruction is to prep are learners for effective and efficient  parley in English in their  mixer and professional situations (Chitravelu et al, 1995, p.4). In many organizations, English is the main  spoken communication of communication and  champion needs to be competent in English in  order to succeed and advance in the respective organization. The importance of English  speech as a global language has al fashions been a major motivation feature in the  tuition and  employment of the language in Malaysia especi everyy as a medium to gain in discrepancyation in science and technology,  physician and trade as  healthy as for entertainment and media. In April 2000, there was an issue  highlighted in the mass media  nigh the reasons behind the inability of some 39,000 graduates in the country to get a job.  tangent Sri Musa Mohamad the Minister    of Education at that time as quoted in the New Straits Times  give tongue to that,  employers did  non just look at  wizards qualification but  in like manner factors like personality, potential, English  proficiency and experience. This implies that job seekers should try to achieve certain  aim of mastery of English to  inspection and repair them secure  impound jobs particularly in private sector. Besides, job interviews for professional vacancies in critical fields like Law,   method of accounting and Engineering are generally understood to be conducted in English (Hanapiah, 2004)In many contexts where English is regarded as a foreign as  fence to a second language, there are many problems in developing real communicative competence in learners including the ability to  hear and comprehend properly. brown and Yule (1983) believe that many language learners regard  mouthing skills as the criteria for knowing a language. They defined fluency as the ability to communicate with  oth   ers much  much than the ability to read, write and comprehend  ad-lib language. However,  education to talk in the foreign language is often considered to be one of the difficult aspects of language  reading for the teacher to help students with. Unlike written language, it is  withal not easy to provide good models of spoken language for the foreign learners.According to Bygate (1987), one of the  basal problems in foreign-language  educational activity is to prepare learners to be able to use the language. How the preparation is done and how successful it  leave alone be, are very much depending on how the teachers  gain the aim of  belief the language (p.3). The main features of speaking which can be traced to the processing conditions of communication involve the time factor in which the words are being spoken as they are being decided and understood. The fact that the language is being spoken as it is being decided affects the  vocalizers ability to  intend and organize the mes   sage, and to control the language. Thus, mistakes often occur in the message and in the choice of words during a conversation (ibid. p12).1.3 ObjectiveThe objective of the  matter is to  check the effects of   labor-based  audition activities on the speaking per clayance of FELDAs EFL learners. The difference in students speaking performance before and  later undergoing the Task -Based Listening activities would be one of the main concerns in this  select. A comparison  give be drawn between the TBL and non TBL classes to see whether there is any difference in students speaking performance.Besides, students  authority to speak is another area of interest to be investigated in this  composition. It is hoped that the  scan will be able to identify any  earthshaking difference in students level of confidence to converse in English after undergoing the Task- based  listening activities as compared to those who  boast not been exposed to the activities.Another objective of the  theater o   f operations is to investigate FELDAs EFL learners attitude towards the implementation of the task-based listening activities. Expressions of either  positivist or negative feelings towards the task-based listening activities will reflect impressions of the effectiveness of the activities in enhancing students speaking skill.1.2  riddle StatementSpeaking is considered one of the  about difficult language skills to acquire among English as a Foreign Language (EFL) students. In rural  scenery schools, particularly in the FELDA (Federal Land Development Authority) scheme, there is a lack of exposure and communicative use of the English language. Most students regard English as serving very limited function once they leave the classroom and as  such they hardly see the need to use it in their  day-by-day life.As in the classroom setting most EFL learners rather remain silent or resort to rote learning when they are  un invalidateable to  react to a speaking task. As such, it is a demand   ing task for language teachers to provide sufficient inputs for students to be competent speakers of English (Bygate, 1987). Students usually feel insecure about their level of English and face problems communicating as  hale as expressing themselves in the target language. As a result, they rather remain silent as they are in fear of making mistakes and do not show active participation in speaking lessons. Ian G. Malcolm (1987) refers to the guarded and taciturn behavior of students who  reject to speak as the shyness syndrome and that this problem has been reported of Polynesians in New Zealand, various American Indian groups, Hispanics in the United States, Black Americans and Southeast Asians. Malcolm quoting Tan (1976) and Salleh (1981) says that many pupils in Southeast Asian classrooms are bilinguals whose use of the classroom language is hesitant. Yap (1979) also quoted as saying that the frequent complaint  in the main in secondary schools is that learners do not respond or    take too long to respond, or speak too softly (cited in Gaudart ,2003, p.2) idiom should thus be given to address this problem as speaking is an  grave element in mastering English language. Therefore, it is important to explore  bare-assed methods of teaching in order to enhance students speaking performance and confidence to use the language.1.4 Research QuestionsThe study attempts to answer the questions that follow1) What is the speaking performance of FELDA learners after undergoing task-based learning activities?2) Do task-based listening activities enhance EFL students confidence to speak in English?3) What are the attitudes of the FELDA EFL learners towards task-based listening activities in enhancing their speaking performance?1.5 Significance of studyThe  conclusions may provide language teachers with specific language teaching procedures to enhance ESL learners ability and confidence to communicate orally in English. Besides, in a wider scope, the study can also be used    as the yardstick in designing supplementary materials to assist teachers in teaching speaking skill  much effectively in the Malaysian classrooms.1.6 Definitions of termsThe following terms are significant in this study1.6.1 Task-based Listening ActivitiesTask-based Language Teaching (TBLT) or Task-based  information (TBI) makes the performance of meaningful tasks central to the learning process. The Task-based listening activities which will be used are based on  honest materials used in teaching second language. Nunan (1999) defines  real materials as spoken or written language data that has been produced in the course of genuine communication, and not specifically written for purposes of language teaching. The materials are based on the real world context outside classroom in situations in which they really occur.Gebhard (1996) suggested some examples of the authentic materials that may  sue as source for lesson planning including for listening and speaking class. The authentic l   istening- viewing materials include TV commercials, quiz shows, cartoons, news clips, comedy shows, movies, soap operas, professionally audio-taped  minuscule stories and novels, radio advertisements, songs, documentaries and sales pitches. In this study, the task based listening activities will include the use of audio CDs on selected stories and songs. Throughout the implementation of the activities students are required to respond to certain tasks related to the selected materials following the framework for task-based learning proposed by Jane Willis (1996) which comprise of pre-task, task cycle and language focus. Among the tasks suggested include listing(e.g. brainstorm/ fact finding),  purchase order or sorting (e.g. sequencing/ ranking), comparing (e.g. matching/ finding similarities or differences), problem solving (e.g. analysing real situation/ decision making), sharing experience (e.g. narrating/opinions) and creative tasks which includes all the tasks mentioned.1.6.2 Sp   eaking PerformanceSpeaking in a second language involves the development of a particular type of communication skills. Because of its circumstances of production, oral language tends to differ from written language in its typical grammar, lexical and discourse patterns (Tareq Mitib, 2009). A person can be considered to be able to perform well in speaking skill when he is able to speak a language using the components correctly for example by making the  refine sounds, choosing the right words and getting the constructions  grammatically correct. Pronunciation, grammar and vocabulary tasks will focus on the need for  coiffure in language accuracy. At the same time, one also needs to get a clear message across and this involves choosing  leave content or ideas to suit a situation, e.g. deciding what is polite or what  faculty appear rude, how to interrupt or how to participate in a conversation. (http//www.britishcouncil.org/languageassistant/pdf/Unit4.pdf )1.6.3 School Based Oral Asse   ssmentPreviously the English SPM  query had an oral examination component which was graded based on the candidates  intuition of a dialogue text and the ability to respond to a pictorial stimuli. However, the test was considered to be  incompetent since students proficiency in English language continued to drop to the point where prospective employers in private and government sectors complained about the inability of graduates to converse in even the most rudimentary situations (Vinodini Murugesan, 2003).In 2002, the School-Based Oral Assessment (SBOA) was implemented for the first time on Form Four students who will be  sitting for SPM in 2003 to replace the old oral assessment and this time it is considered to be in line with the communicative language teaching approach adopted in Malaysian schools. The School-Based Oral Assessment (SBOA) consists of 4  mock ups. The models are Model 1Individual, Model 2Student-Prompter, Model 3Pair work and Model 4 Group work. Students are to be    assessed twice in Form Four (using Model 1 and 2) and once in Form Five (using either Model 3 or Model 4). Marks are given based on students ability to converse on a  topic effectively with appropriate responses, speak fluently using correct and acceptable pronunciation, speak coherently, speak the language using a wide range of appropriate vocabulary  in spite of appearance context and speak using correct grammar. In some cases, students can actually request to repeat the test if deemed  needed especially when they are not satisfied with their mark. The total mark for each assessment is 30. When the students are in Form 5, the best mark among the three assessments will be taken and submitted  unneurotic with other School Based Assessment Marks for SPM examination to the Malaysian Examination Board (Lembaga Peperiksaan Malaysia).1.6.4 ConfidenceConfidence can be defined as a belief in one own ability to do things and be successful (Oxford Advance Learners Dictionary, 7th ed., 2005,    p.318). It is ones perceptions of ones own abilities to achieve a  tell  issue. ARCS Model of Motivational Design  genuine by John M. Keller of Florida State University identified Attention, Relevance, Confidence and Satisfaction as the four steps for promoting and sustaining motivation in the learning process. According to Keller, confidence helps students to  visualize their likelihood for success. If they feel they cannot meet the objectives or that the cost (time or  drift) is too high, their motivation will decrease. Besides, confidence also provides objectives and prerequisites that help students to estimate the probability of success by presenting performance requirements and evaluation criteria. It allows for small steps of growth during the learning process, provide feedback and support internal attributions for success. not only learners should feel some degree of control over their learning and assessment, they too should believe that their success is a direct result of    the amount of effort they have put forth (Keller, 1983 and 1987 cited in http//www.learning-theories.com/kellers-arcs-model-of-motivational-design.html.).Confidence in speaking involves ability to speak the target language fluently using the right rules and appropriate choice of words. In speech situation, thinking, listening and speaking go on almost simultaneously and people expect feedback on or response to what they have said almost as soon as they stop speaking (Chitravelu et.al, 1995). Anxiety of making mistakes is one of the major obstacles that learners have to overcome in learning speaking because most of the time learners are reluctant to be judged by listeners. Of all the four language skills, speaking skill is probably the one most affected by personality features. Students who are confident and have experienced success are likely to be more motivated and more  voluntary to try harder. Therefore, teachers have an important role in building up students confidence to speak    by being sensitive, sympathetic and encouraging as well as selecting material that is motivating and within the ability of the students (ibid).1.6.5 AttitudesAttitudes refer to a persons way of thinking or feeling about somebody or something the way that he or she behaves towards somebody or something actually shows how the person thinks or feels (Oxford Advance Learners Dictionary, 7th ed., 2005, p.85). The measurement of language attitudes provides information that is useful in teaching and language planning (Richards, Platt and Platt, 1997 cited in Tareq Mitib, 2009). In this study the EFL learners attitudes towards the Task-based listening activities will be measured through the use of a questionnaire which will be developed from the findings from focus group discussions. The questions will comprise of an adaptation of Gardners (1985) Attitude/ Motivation Test Battery (AMTB) and Rossett (1982) Needs Analysis questionnaire.1.7 Limitation/ DelimitationSince this study will be car   ried out within a relatively short period of time on students with average to good proficiency of English, it would thus be  provoke to see if using task-based listening activities on a lower English-proficiency group of EFL students with varying time spent would have a different effect on the results. Thus, this study might not be able to represent the whole FELDA scheme students speaking performance because only two groups of students from a school will be selected. Further studies need to be conducted in order to seek similarities or differences on this issue.Chapter 2 Review of Literature2.1 Relationship between listening and speakingSpeech involves communication between people and the rules that apply to all forms of interpersonal behaviour also apply to speaking behaviour (Chitravelu et.al, 1995, p.59). Graham-Marr (2004) mentioned many reasons for  center in listening and speaking in EFL classroom and one of them is the fact that speaking skills have been found to be a fundam   ental skill necessary to succeed in life. The ability to speak in the target language has always been associated with the success of learning the language. Before a person can speak the language he learnt, he should first be able to listen and understand the language. Listening should be the first and foremost skill to be acquired in learning a new language because understanding spoken words is prerequisite to speaking, reading and writing and that comprehension should precede reproduction. Listening skill transfers to other skills and promoting listening skills before focusing on oral skills can result in increased second language acquisition. (Cheung, 2010).The relationship of listening and speaking skills was  provided elaborated by Goss (1982) who claimed that listening is a process of taking what you  divulge and organizing it into verbal units to which you can apply meaning. Applied to speech processing, listening requires that you structure the sounds that you hear and organi   ze them into words, phrases, sentences, or other linguistic units. Bowen, Madsen and Hilferty (1985) (ibid) defined listening as attending to and interpreting oral language. The student should be able to hear oral speech in English, segment the stream of sounds, group them into lexical and syntactic units (words, phrases, sentences), and understand the message they convey (p. 73).Gary (1975) cited in Ghazali, (2003) said that giving pre-eminence to listening comprehension particularly in the early stages of second language teaching and learning contributes advantages of four different types, namely cognitive, efficiency, utility and effective. As such, Doff (1988) added that speaking skills cannot be developed unless listening skill is also developed. In order to have successful conversation, students must understand what is said to them because later on the ability to understand spoken English may be very important for studying, listening to the radio or understanding foreign visit   ors. To develop this ability, students need plenty of practice in listening to English spoken at normal speed (p.163).A listening lesson gives students the opportunity to listen to native speakers conversations if the related materials are well-chosen, and, listening to the target language a lot can help the students  change in their pronunciation (Gethin and Gunnemark, 1996). Bruton (199714-15) argues that students need to listen to prepare themselves for their future listening. They need to listen in order to know how to produce. The better students understand what they hear, the better they will take part in spoken interactions. Although students usually face difficulties to understand the language produced by the native speakers in the listening activities, teachers have to be creative to tackle the problem by exposing students to more of the materials. At the  tooth root of the listening activities, teachers help may still be needed to explain to the students what is required f   rom them. However, the dependency on teachers can slowly be eliminated later on when the students are  works(a) on the activities or in their groups.In order to measure the effectiveness of any speaking lesson, students need to be tested. The two main aspects of direct procedures for  interrogatory speaking according to Nation and Newton (2009) are the way in which the person who is being tested is encouraged to speak and the way in which the speaker performance is assessed. The first procedure can include interviewing, describing something for someone to draw and discussing while the latter can include rating scale, communicative result and  duty assignment marks for the parts of an outcome (p.171).2.2 Task-based Instruction in Language ClassroomIn task-based language teaching (TBLT), syllabus content and instructional processes are selected with  destination to the communicative tasks which learners will (either actually or potentially) need to engage in outside the classroom and    also with reference to theoretical and empirical insights into those social and psycholinguistic processes which facilitate language acquisition. Among the features identified by Nunan (1991) for this approach is the emphasis on learning to communicate through interaction in the target language, the introduction of authentic texts into the learning situation, the provision of opportunities for learners to focus, not only on language, but also on the learning process itself, an enhancement of the learners own personal experiences as important contributing elements to classroom learning and an attempt to link classroom language learning with language activation outside the classroom.According to Brown (2001), Task- based Language Teaching (TBLT) puts tasks at the centre of the methodological focus. The learning process is viewed as a set of communicative tasks that are directly linked to the curricular goals they serve. The main characteristics of TBLT according to Ellis (2003) includ   e the natural or naturalistic use of language, learners-centred activities rather than teacher-centred, focus on form and tasks serve as the means for achieving natural use of language. Ellis also claimed that the traditional approach of Present, Practice and Produce (PPP) are inadequate. Some critics also supported this and viewed PPP as clearly being teacher-centred and therefore sits uneasily in a more humanistic and learner-centred framework (Harmer, 1988, p.66).Task can be defined in various ways. Nunan (1999) in Bahrami (2010) for example, defined a task as a  fade of classroom work that involves learners in comprehending, manipulating, producing or interacting in the target language while their attention is focused on mobilizing their grammatical knowledge in order to express meaning, and in which the intention is to convey meaning rather than to manipulate form. The task should also have a  instinct of completeness, able to stand alone as a communicative act in its own right    with a beginning, middle and an end. (p. 25).Long (1985a) as cited in Nunan (1991) suggests that a task is nothing more or less than the things people do in everyday life like for examples buying shoes, making reservations, finding destinations, and writing cheques. Breen (1987) similarly suggests that a task is any structured language learning endeavour which has a particular objective, appropriate content, a specified working procedure, and a range of outcomes for those who undertake the task. Task is therefore assumed to refer to a range of work plans which have the overall purpose of facilitating language learning-from the  naive and brief exercise type, to more complex and lengthy activities such as group problem- solving or simulations and decision making (p. 23).Prabhu (1987) stands as the first significant person in the development of Task-based instructions in language classrooms. He defines a task as an activity which required learners to arrive at an outcome from given i   nformation through some process of thought, and which allowed teachers to control and regulate that process (cited in Tareq Mitib ,2009). Nunan (1989) further defines a task as a piece of classroom work which involves learners in comprehending, manipulating, producing or interacting in the target language while their attention is principally focused on meaning rather than form (p.10). He suggests that in all definitions of tasks, one can see communicative language use where the learner focuses on meaning instead of linguistic structure. many an(prenominal) people have studied the implementation of Task-based instruction in language classrooms and have advised using tasks in language classrooms because students motivation rises through  assign tasks. On looking at the  supportive results that the use of tasks may bring about in the EFL classroom, it can be said that using a  configuration of tasks in class gives positive results (Ruso, 2007). Bahrami (2010) examined the influence of    four specific types of task-based activities of matching, form-filling, labelling and selecting on the listening ability of 90 senior EFL learners of Sadra English Institute of Darood .The data for the quasi(prenominal)-experimental study included two task-based tests of listening comprehension and a test of language proficiency. The result shows that there was a significant relationship between the three tasks of matching, labelling and form filling on the other hand and listening comprehension on the other. However, there was no relationship observed for the task of selecting and listening comprehension. In conclusion, not only the listening-comprehension skill of the EFL students tended to improve through exposure to task-based input it is also proven to be suitable for students of various levels.Similarly, Tareq Mitib (2009) who also adopted a quasi experimental design to study the effects of Task-based Language Teaching (TBLT) on developing speaking skills among the Palestinian    Secondary EFL students from two schools in Israel concluded that the method succeeded in improving the students speaking skills and develop students attitude towards English language. It was found that girls speaking skill improved more than the boys when classroom practice was organized and authentic as in the case of TBLT. Boys on the other hand, did better in the conventional teaching situations. Tareq therefore claimed that task-based language teaching can be the  closure for the lack of exposure to authentic English as it enabled students to practise using the language through different activities in real world tasks and in a stress free atmosphere. This finding conforms to Underwood, (1998) Gethin and Gunnemark, (1996) and Kenworthys, (1987) claims, that, exposing students to native speakers of English Language through listening gives them the opportunities to acquire the correct model of English pronunciation which will  in the end leads to intelligibility (cited in Ghazali,    2003).Awang and Md. Supie (2011) stated that, one of the main issues in second language learning is ESL learners who are less proficient in the language opt to avoid speaking in English language classes. Some learners might find speaking English in front of the class as very intimidating. In a way it implies that regardless of how many English classes students have attended, if they do not practise the language, they will not be able to improve their communication skills as well as their self-confidence. Both researchers proposed that task-based speaking activities would enable students to communicate easily as the activities are usually conducted in pair work or group work. As such, a study was conducted in Universiti Teknologi Malaysia(UTM) on 30 second year students from the Faculty of Electrical Engineering enrolled for the Advanced English for  faculty member Communication course in semester 2, 2007/2008. A set of questionnaire was designed and distributed to find out the stud   ents perspectives on task-based speaking activities in fostering their communication in English. This study also seeks to find out which types of Task-Based Speaking Activities (TBSA) that highly promotes learners communication in English. The types of task-based speaking activities used in the study were problem-solving, information-gap, and sharing personal experience or feelings. Results show that all the 30 participants agreed that task-based speaking activities improved their communication in English because the activities offered opportunities to practise the language. It was also found that students with low level of proficiency in English also participated in the TBSA during English classes and they were not intimidated by their low level of proficiency. As for the activities, problem-solving is found to be the most  preferent type of TBSA that encouraged participation and use of English language.Other study related to the use of TBL includes an exploration of the implementa   tion of TBLT in three primary classrooms in Hong Kong by Carless (2001). The subjects of the case study were three female English teachers who implemented task-based innovation over a seven months period in their primary one and primary two classrooms with children aged six to seven. Results reveal that there was a certain amount of interplay between different issues studied like for example, the more positive the teachers attitude towards TBLT, the more likely she was to take time doing the preparation of the supplementary materials for her class or to allocate time for carrying out activities (cited in Tareq Mitib, 2009).Despites many positive feedbacks of using TBL on EFL and ESL students, there are also evidences of sceptical perceptions on its implementation. One of them is in a case study conducted by In-Jae Jeon and Jung-won Hahn on EFL teachers perceptions on the practice of TBLT in Korean secondary School Classroom in 2005. Data were collected through questionnaires from 22   8 teachers at 38 different middle and high schools in Korea. The overall findings of the survey show that even though majority of the respondents have ahigher level of understanding about TBLT concepts, teachers still  continue some fear of adopting TBLT because of perceived disciplinary problems related to classroom practice. Other reason for teachers fear to adopt TBLT is related to their lack of confidence. Hence, much consideration should be given to overcome the potential obstacles such as on the part of the teachers before TBLT can really be successfully implemented.2.3 Theoretical Framework of TBLTask-based learning (TBL) seems to gain currency since the publication of Jane Willis Framework for Task-Based Learning in 1996. N. Prabhu originally popularizes TBL in early 80s and since then has influenced subsequent models of Task Based Teaching such as Willis (1996) who developed a framework for task-based learning. Prabhu (1987) used a task-based approach with secondary school    classes in Bangalore, India in his Communicational Teaching Project beginning 1979. Reports on the Bangalore project indicated that a syllabus organized around problem solving tasks and feedback can effectively accomplish and in many ways improve on what a traditional linguistic syllabus provides (cited in Tareq Mitib, 2009, pp. 53). In Framework for Task-Based Learning (1996), Willis proposed a three stages process of carrying out TBL. The stages include pre-task (introduction to topic and task), task cycle (planning and reporting) and language focus (analysis and practice).The framework can be illustrated as belowFRAMEWORK OF TBL (Jane Willis, 1996)PretaskIntroduction to topic and task instruction(Exposure)Task cycleUse  expose to tasks (6 tasksTypes), planning (prepare to reportoutcomes), reporting, posttask (optional)Focus on formsLanguage FocusAnalysis learners focus on form,Ask about language featuresPractice teacher conduct activitiesTASK(Introduction to topic/ task)TASK CYCL   E(Task /Planning /Report)LANGUAGE FOCUS(Analysis Practice)In the Pre-Task stage, the learners and teachers explore the topic and the teacher may highlight useful words and phrases while helping students to understand the task instructions. The purpose of pre-task is to prepare students to perform the task in ways that will promote acquisition. As for the Task Cycle stage, the students perform the task in pairs or small groups while the teacher monitors or facilitate the lesson from a distance. During this stage students will also plan on how to report or present to the class what they have done and how they do it. At the same time teacher should encourage students to communicate in the target language while helping students to prepare w  
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.